Showing posts with label Voting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Voting. Show all posts

Monday, November 10, 2008

Catholic Voters

Prolife
Inside Catholic has broken them into the following categories:
1) Pro-life voters who would vote pro-life even if their bishop/priest and the USCCB supported the pro-choice candidate.

2) Pro-life voters who understand the bishops to be saying they cannot vote for a pro-choice candidate, and who therefore don't.

3) Pro-life voters who understand the bishops to be saying they need to balance abortion with other issues, and end up voting pro-life.

4) Pro-life voters who understand the bishops to be saying they need to balance abortion with other issues, and end up voting pro-choice.

5) Pro-life voters who honestly believe Obama will be the more pro-life candidate.

6) Pro-choice voters who really don't care what the bishops say and who vote pro-choice.

7) Voters who are "personally-pro-life," but who don't want to "legislate morality," and therefore lean strongly pro-choice in the voting booth.

8) Voters for whom abortion just isn't an issue in either direction.
They seem to have covered all the bases. If not, please leave a comment on their blog.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Hawaii - Vote Yes for ConCon



On November 4, we have a significant opportunity for the peoples’ voices to be heard through a ConCon. That opportunity has been taken away from the people for the past 30 years. We must not allow it to be bypassed again.

Please encourage your friends to vote YES for ConCon. Even if, the opposition says nothing is wrong that need fixing, think about it, if Con Con does not go pass this Nov. 4th and any laws which you do not agree with gets passed by activist legislators without regard to the people's will, NONE of us will have the opportunity to fix it.

This is a Safety Valve for the People of Hawaii.

I know for instance, the laws on Pro-choice in the state is so tightly written that they have practically locked up legislation, disallowed any review (on the grounds of confidentiality) to even examine what harm is done to the woman (instate or from out of state) who may have had a blotched abortions, suffered effects from artificial contraceptives all in the name of women's health.

God Bless us all and please pray for a wise Pro-Life Presidential team who will enact God's Natural laws on Traditional Marriage. If God called us by name (gave each of us tasks to fulfill) & formed us in our mother's womb even before we were born, think how many potential future leaders, scientists, doctors, financially responsible leaders are not around to fix problems (caused by greedy CEOs) or even the least amongst us to do the tasks which many do not like to do....L.J., a concerned citizen in HI.
Please vote “YES” for the ConCon. And remember a no vote counts as a “NO.” Leaving that question blank means that you are voting “NO.”




Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Can a Catholic Vote for Obama?


Picture source here. Be sure to visit their site to see other prolife T-shirts, etc.

I found the following article at the Roman Catholic Blog

Catholics for Obama?

May I remind you the 5 non-negotiable issues a Catholic must consider when voting:

FIVE NON-NEGOTIABLES

These five current issues concern actions that are intrinsically evil and must never be promoted by the law. Intrinsically evil actions are those that fundamentally conflict with the moral law and can never be deliberately performed under any circumstances. It is a serious sin to deliberately endorse or promote any of these actions, and no candidate who really wants to advance the common good will support any action contrary to the non-negotiable principles involved in these issues.

1. Abortion

The Church teaches that, regarding a law permitting abortions, it is "never licit to obey it, or to take part in a propaganda campaign in favor of such a law, or to vote for it" (EV 73). Abortion is the intentional and direct killing of an innocent human being, and therefore it is a form of homicide.

The unborn child is always an innocent party, and no law may permit the taking of his life. Even when a child is conceived through rape or incest, the fault is not the child’s, who should not suffer death for others’ sins.

2. Euthanasia

Often disguised by the name "mercy killing," euthanasia is also a form of homicide. No person has a right to take his own life, and no one has the right to take the life of any innocent person.

In euthanasia, the ill or elderly are killed, by action or omission, out of a misplaced sense of compassion, but true compassion cannot include intentionally doing something intrinsically evil to another person (cf. EV 73).

3. Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Human embryos are human beings. "Respect for the dignity of the human being excludes all experimental manipulation or exploitation of the human embryo" (CRF 4b).

Recent scientific advances show that often medical treatments that researchers hope to develop from experimentation on embryonic stem cells can be developed by using adult stem cells instead. Adult stem cells can be obtained without doing harm to the adults from whom they come. Thus there is no valid medical argument in favor of using embryonic stem cells. And even if there were benefits to be had from such experiments, they would not justify destroying innocent embryonic humans.

4. Human Cloning

"Attempts . . . for obtaining a human being without any connection with sexuality through ‘twin fission,’ cloning, or parthenogenesis are to be considered contrary to the moral law, since they are in opposition to the dignity both of human procreation and of the conjugal union" (RHL I:6).

Human cloning also involves abortion because the "rejected" or "unsuccessful" embryonic clones are destroyed, yet each clone is a human being.

5. Homosexual "Marriage"

True marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Legal recognition of any other union as "marriage" undermines true marriage, and legal recognition of homosexual unions actually does homosexual persons a disfavor by encouraging them to persist in what is an objectively immoral arrangement.

"When legislation in favor of the recognition of homosexual unions is proposed for the first time in a legislative assembly, the Catholic lawmaker has a moral duty to express his opposition clearly and publicly and to vote against it. To vote in favor of a law so harmful to the common good is gravely immoral" (UHP 10).


Above is from Catholic Answers' A Voter's Guide for Serious Catholics

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

The Holy Father's 3-Point Agenda for Voting Catholics

Shared by Sue

The three-point agenda is...

1. "Pro-Life"
2. "Pro-Family"
3. "School-Choice"

From:

The Pope's Three Point Agenda for Voting Catholics

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

Catholic Voters - Resource

Someone shared the following website with me via email.

One Nation Under God